Exchange of ideas with Elon Musk
Elon Musk has repeatedly expressed his critical view of the party system, the German federal government and other global issues on Platform X.
His statements stimulate discussion and new perspectives. I share this criticism and the associated approaches in many points.
On this page, I comment on some of his statements in the form of open letters in order to continue the dialogue on these important issues.
All site visitors are cordially invited to discuss the thoughts published here in the Telegram group Querdenkerforum or at X and to contribute their ideas.
January 29, 2025
“Alice for Germany” - A strategic approach
Dear Mr. Musk,
The political landscape in Germany is changing. According to the latest
Forsa survey from January 29, 2025, the distribution of seats in the Bundestag would be as follows if elections had taken place on that date:
- CDU/CSU: 124 seats (37.5%)
- AfD: 83 seats (25%)
- SPD: 66 seats (20%)
- Alliance 90/The Greens: 58 seats (17.5%)
These figures show that the next Federal Chancellor - regardless of the coalition formation - would most likely be
Friedrich Merz. In this scenario, the chancellorship of
Dr. Alice Weidel, which you publicly favor, seems
unthinkable to many “normal” political observers.
But lateral thinkers think differently. They abandon established thought patterns and consider the “impossible”.
An unconventional strategy for success
The crucial question is: Is there a realistic way to organize a majority for Alice Weidel?
A coalition of the AfD (158 seats), SPD (126 seats) and Greens (110 seats) is out of the question due to the ideological differences between the AfD and the other two parties.
This leaves Alice Weidel 234 votes
short of becoming chancellor.
The solution?
Win party-independent direct mandates!
Instead of distributing the
approximately 60 million first votes in Germany among
3,000 direct candidates, a strategic concentration on
a single outstanding personality per constituency
could secure the required mandates.
The principle:
- A joint, non-party direct candidate
should be selected in each of Germany's
299 constituencies.
- This candidate undertakes in advance to
vote for Alice Weidel in the election for chancellor.
- This could win 234 additional direct mandates, which would be enough for a parliamentary majority.
The election strategy: what do voters need to do?
For this strategy to succeed, voters need to rethink.
It is no longer about party affiliation, but about an overriding objective.
The clear message to voters is:
👉
Pick a direct candidate in your constituency who is:
✔ honest,
✔ competent,
✔ reliable,
✔ oriented towards the common good,
✔ independent of political parties and who can guarantee to vote for Alice Weidel as Federal Chancellor.
This is the only way to achieve a political turnaround.
Communication & dissemination of the strategy
This core message must be disseminated as
widely
and
effectively as possible over the next 24 days.
Several channels are suitable for this:
X (formerly Twitter) and other social networks
Direct communication with supporters and multipliers
Public meetings
The first major milestone is the
rally on February 8 in Wuppertal, which has already been registered and is expected to attract between
250 and 2,500 participants.
I cordially invite you to take part in this event - either
in person or by Zoom connection. A message from you could send a strong signal.
Why this move would be historic
If this strategy works, it would be the
first chancellorship in the history of the Federal Republic of Germany that is not made possible by the usual party mechanisms, but by
independent direct candidates.
This would also be in line with
Article 38 (2) of the Basic Law, which requires that members of the Bundestag
act free from instructions and subject only to their conscience - a principle that has long since been eroded in reality.
Additional information & support
As a lawyer and former lecturer in state and constitutional law, I am always available to answer your questions about German electoral law.
In addition, I am organizing the presentation of Dr. Reiner Füllmich, one of the best-known fighters for freedom of expression, who is currently being held in Rosdorf Prison. He is running as an independent direct candidate.
Further information can be found at: www.rakrause.de/dfw
Conclusion: Let's make history
Mr. Musk, your support - whether through a public statement, a social media campaign or a
Zoom call-in on February 8
- could be instrumental in creating an alternative political reality.
Thank you in advance for your interest and potential support for the
“Alice for Germany” project.
Best regards
Helmut Krause
January 8, 2025
Request for Support for Dr. Reiner Füllmich
Dear Mr. Musk,
We have noted with great interest your description of the third-highest-ranking representative of the Federal Republic of Germany as a "fool." Your critical assessment has sparked discussions among us.
I represent the United Independent Candidates, a non-partisan association (as defined by § 34g No. 2 of the German Income Tax Act) and part of Germany's constructively critical civil society. Currently, we are meeting in Meersburg on Lake Constance to determine what it will take to ensure that on February 23, 2025, two to 299 independent, competent, and community-oriented constituency candidates are elected to the German Bundestag.
A Critical Assessment
The established parties – CDU/CSU, SPD, FDP, and the Greens – have shaped German politics for decades, but often without delivering the quality expected of them. We have some questions for you as well:
- Was it the crisis management during the pandemic that led you to your judgment of the Federal Chancellor?
- Was it the economic policies of his cabinet, whose results many perceive as disastrous?
- Or perhaps the justice system, which critics view as suboptimal and far from independent?
Judges and lawyers in Germany who challenge state misconduct often face significant risks. A prominent example is Judge Christian Dettmar, who was sentenced in 2023 to a two-year suspended sentence for judicial overreach after issuing a ruling against mandatory mask-wearing.
Another case is that of my colleague, Dr. Reiner Füllmich, who, as spokesperson for the Corona Committee during the pandemic, worked to uncover state misconduct. He has been held in pre-trial detention at Rosdorf Prison for over a year – officially on charges of embezzlement. However, many believe his incarceration is tied to his role in addressing the pandemic’s fallout.
Our Vision for Germany
The United Independent Candidates aim to ensure that outstanding individuals like Dr. Reiner Füllmich guide the future of our nation – rather than individuals perceived in public discourse as "fools" or "incompetents."
Dr. Reiner Füllmich is running as an independent candidate in District 101 (Wuppertal) for the 2025 Bundestag elections.
To present his visions and goals directly to the citizens in his constituency, it is of utmost importance that he personally attends at least one public gathering in Wuppertal.
The ideal date for this event would be:
February 8, 2025
Time: 12:00 PM – 4:00 PM
His legal defense team or I could file an expedited request for temporary release on that day. However, as it remains uncertain whether this request will be approved in time, I have a special request for you:
My Request to You, Mr. Musk
Could you consider contacting the administrative office of the Rosdorf Prison at
+49 551 99 73 30?
A brief note from you emphasizing that Dr. Füllmich's participation in the Wuppertal event is of great importance and that denying him this opportunity would be inappropriate could make a decisive difference.
Your support could help ensure that Dr. Füllmich delivers his message directly to the people.
Thank you in advance for your support and commitment!
Yours sincerely,
Helmut Krause
Helmut's dream 02
I dreamt tonight that Elon Musk answered me as follows:
Supporting non-party direct candidates
Hello Helmut,
Thank you very much for your message and for taking the time to explain your thoughts to me in such detail.
I share your conviction that real change often has to start outside the established structures. Your analysis of the German electoral system and the challenges faced by independent direct candidates is not only impressive but also deeply relevant.
The idea of promoting non-party direct candidates fits perfectly with my vision of a politics that is not hindered by rigid institutions or factional constraints. Freedom, personal responsibility and independence are fundamental values that can make the difference not only in technology, but also in politics.
It is particularly important that we take bold steps to reshape the political landscape. Your work with the United Direct Candidates shows how this can be achieved in a practical way.
I will consider your suggestion and see great potential in using my reach to draw attention not only to the importance of the primary vote, but also to the crucial role that independent direct candidates can play.
Thank you for highlighting this important point. I wish you and the United Direct Candidates every success and will be happy to discuss or cooperate with you further.
With best regards,
Elon
December 29, 2024
Support for non-party direct candidates in the 2025 federal election
Hello Elon,
It is impressive to see how you appear as an influential visionary and supporter of future political developments. Your commitment to the 2025 Bundestag elections and your call to strengthen the AfD with second votes is undoubtedly a significant contribution to the political debate in Germany.
However, as a citizen, lawyer and former lecturer in constitutional law, I would like to offer you a supplementary thought: Your appeal only covers 52.5% of the political reality in Germany.
Why?
Of the 630 members of the Bundestag in future, 331 will be elected with the second votes via the parties' state lists. The remaining 299 direct mandates - that is 47.5% - will be elected directly with the first votes in the constituencies.
In the past, many voters gave their first vote to the direct candidate of the party to which they also gave their second vote. This practice meant that the direct mandates went almost exclusively to the major established parties such as the CDU/CSU and SPD - a pattern that made it almost impossible for non-party candidates to have any influence.
A constitutional view of the practice
An anecdote from 2009 illustrates the problem: at an event organized by the “Mehr Demokratie e.V.” association in the Bundestag, a former MP described how many MPs do not come to the plenary session prepared for important votes, but instead inform themselves on the spot with ushers about the expected vote and follow the instructions of the parliamentary group leadership.
This practice contradicts Article 38 (1) of the Basic Law, which stipulates that MPs should be subject only to their conscience and free from instructions. In reality, however, many act as “party soldiers” who implement the instructions of the party leadership.
The solution: Independent direct candidates
The United Direct Candidates, an association without party character in accordance with Section 34g No. 2 EStG, is committed to electing non-party direct candidates to the Bundestag on February 23, 2025. These candidates are not bound by party structures and can decide freely in the interests of their voters.
Voters have the following options in the upcoming Bundestag elections:
- First vote for a candidate from an established party:
This secures the status quo and preserves the power of traditional party structures.
- First vote for a candidate from a small party or a “no-name”:
This vote often has no effect and has little influence on the formation of government.
- First vote for an independent direct candidate:
This offers the chance to bring about real change. In a stalemate scenario, an independent candidate could be decisive as the “kingmaker” or “tip the scales”.
Your influence could make the difference
Your appeal to not only use the second vote strategically, but also to support independent direct candidates, could change the political system in Germany for good.
Imagine how your reach and persuasiveness could help strengthen a movement that focuses on personal responsibility, independence and true representation of the people.
I wish you continued success in your campaign for the Bundestag elections and hope that you will take this idea into consideration.
With best regards
Helmut Krause
December 23, 2024
Helmut's Dream
Last night, I dreamed that Elon Musk responded to me as follows:
An Inspiring Vision for Politics
Hello Helmut,
Thank you for your message and your thoughtful considerations. I appreciate your desire to create a system based on intelligence, integrity, and commitment to the common good—values that are crucial in all areas, whether in politics, business, or science.
The idea of shaping political power through independent and competent individuals is highly intriguing and deserves attention. It aligns with my belief that progress is only possible through bold, innovative approaches and a clear vision. Current systems, whether in politics or elsewhere, often suffer from inefficient structures that hinder courageous decisions.
Your description of the political situation in Thuringia and the potential deadlock in the Bundestag in 2025 indicates that reforms are urgently needed. The notion that independent deputies in key positions could make a real difference is promising. Such individuals could indeed bridge the gaps that often exist in polarized political landscapes.
Regarding your question: Yes, I believe it is possible for civil society to elect outstanding non-partisan individuals to the Bundestag—but it requires more than just time. It needs a clear, compelling vision that inspires people, as well as strategic thinking to orchestrate this change. The power that arises from the impossible is often the greatest driving force.
Perhaps I can offer something practical: Technology platforms like X (formerly Twitter) could be utilized to foster dialogue, mobilize supporters, and raise awareness for your initiative. Networking and direct engagement with the public are crucial to launching such a movement.
From my experience: Every major change begins with a small, unwavering idea and the willingness to overcome all obstacles.
I wish you much success in this ambitious mission.
Best regards,
Elon Musk
December 21, 2024
Hello Elon,
Thank you very much for addressing important issues worldwide and initiating inspiring discussions. Many people in Germany feel understood by your statements, even if you often encounter headwinds from the established media. I would like to take this opportunity to share with you two fundamental topics that I have been thinking about:
1. Religions in the 21st century
Religions have deeply shaped the history of mankind. They were a source of community, hope and moral orientation. At the same time, the exclusivity of some religions – their claim to uniqueness – potentially harbours conflicts. These tendencies have led to persecution and confrontations in the past.
In Germany, Article 4 of our Basic Law protects freedom of religion, which is an essential achievement. But the question arises: In the 21st century, should religions that hold intolerant attitudes enjoy the same protection as those that advocate tolerance and humanity?
Perhaps it is time to think about how religions can develop further in order to continue to provide positive impetus for society in the third millennium – both in Germany and worldwide.
2. States, borders and the future of the United Nations
The diversity and size of the states within the UN is impressive. But the differences are enormous: A country like Nauru is 129,630 times smaller than China in terms of population. Such discrepancies raise the question of whether the current structure of the UN, which is primarily based on states, is the best way for global cooperation.
States themselves are changing. Borders are being redrawn, some countries are dissolving, others are gaining influence. This raises fundamental questions: Should we continue to hold on to the previous state order in the 21st century? Or would it make more sense to think about new forms of global cooperation – perhaps even based on the 5,000 to 7,000 ethnic and cultural peoples who live on earth?
A forward-looking idea could be to create a "database of humanity" with the help of artificial intelligence or an interdisciplinary team of experts. This could capture the real interests of all people and peoples and separate them from manipulable opinions or short-term wishes. The aim would be to understand the true needs of the world's population and to make decisions based on them.
A look back, a look forward
History shows how dangerous it can be when questions are asked incorrectly. An example from Germany's past is Joseph Goebbels' famous question in 1943: "Do you want total war?" The answer was a collective "yes". But if people had honestly thought about their true interests at that time, the answers would probably have been very different: peace, security and the survival of their families.
Perhaps today is the time to ask the right questions – about states, about religions, and about humanity as a whole. I hope these thoughts inspire new reflections and look forward to your perspective.
Best regards
Helmut